“Under Paris” Movie Review: A Wild Ride Down the Seine

Introduction:

Imagine a giant shark terrorizing the sewers of Paris. Sounds ridiculous, right? Well, that’s precisely the premise of “Under Paris,” a movie that combines cheesy fun with a touch of environmental commentary. But is this film worth your time? Let’s dive into the good, the bad, and the overall experience of “Under Paris.”

The Good:

Cheesetastic Fun:

If you love movies like “Snakes on a Plane” for their sheer ridiculousness, “Under Paris” is right up your alley. The film embraces its absurd premise with gusto, delivering over-the-top energy that will have you laughing more than screaming. It doesn’t aim for “Jaws”-level chills but instead offers unintentional humor that makes it a fun watch.

Surprisingly Competent:

Compared to the slew of low-budget shark movies out there, “Under Paris” stands out for its surprisingly decent quality. The acting is better than you’d expect, with performances that keep you engaged. The plot moves at a brisk pace, avoiding the sluggishness that plagues many monster movies. While the special effects aren’t groundbreaking, they are watchable and occasionally impressive.

Eco-Twist:

One unexpected aspect of “Under Paris” is its weak attempt at an environmental message. The movie tries to add a layer of depth by highlighting issues related to pollution and environmental neglect. Although it’s not deeply explored, this eco-twist adds a bit more substance to the otherwise straightforward monster mayhem.

The Bad:

Silly Premise:

Let’s face it: the idea of a giant shark swimming through the sewers of Paris is hard to swallow. The film doesn’t even try to make it believable, which can be both a blessing and a curse. On the one hand, it embraces its silliness, but on the other hand, it’s difficult to suspend your disbelief enough to fully immerse yourself in the story.

Uneven Tone:

“Under Paris” struggles to find its footing between goofy action and genuine scares. The film flip-flops between moments of intended comedy and attempts at horror, leaving the audience unsure how to feel. This uneven tone can be jarring, making it hard to settle into the movie’s rhythm.

CGI Shark:

The quality of the shark effects varies throughout the film. At times, the CGI is passable, but other times it looks like something out of an early 2000s video game. This inconsistency can pull you out of the experience, especially during key action scenes where you expect the visuals to be at their best.

Overall Impression:

Popcorn Flick:

“Under Paris” is the epitome of a popcorn flick. It’s perfect for a casual movie night with friends where you can laugh, riff, and enjoy the absurdity together. If you’re looking for a mindless shark movie to entertain you, this film fits the bill.

Lack of Plausibility and Scares:

However, if you’re seeking a genuinely scary or plausible horror movie, “Under Paris” might not be for you. The unrealistic elements and lack of serious scares mean it won’t satisfy fans of more traditional horror films. It’s more about the fun of the ride than the terror of the shark.

Conclusion:

In summary, “Under Paris” is a mixed bag. It offers cheesy fun, decent acting, and a fast-paced plot that makes it enjoyable in a group setting. However, its silly premise, uneven tone, and inconsistent CGI might be off-putting for some viewers. If you go in with the right expectations—looking for a laugh rather than a fright—you’ll likely have a good time.

You may also like :

“Sweet Tooth” season 3 is live : Here an Honest review on this season.